ANALISIS SENTIMEN WARGANET INDONESIA TERHADAP PERUBAHAN KEBIJAKAN TABUNGAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT

Authors

  • Rengga Vernanda Lembaga Administrasi Negara
  • Afifah Rahmawati Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37145/qy0p6p49

Keywords:

Partisipasi, Sentimen, Warganet, Tapera

Abstract

Pemerintah Indonesia baru saja mengeluarkan kebijakan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Penyelenggaraan Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat. Kebijakan ini menuai polemik di masyarakat yang dapat dilihat dari banyaknya aspirasi warganet yang tersampaikan melalui kanal-kanal berita di media sosial. Dalam perspektif kebijakan publik, partisipasi warganet ini menunjukan bahwa masyarakat memiliki kesempatan untuk menyampaikan aspirasinya secara argumentatif dengan tujuan agar aspirasi yang disampaikan dapat memengaruhi pembuatan maupun implementasi kebijakan yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat sentimen warganet terhadap perubahan kebijakan yang terjadi. Selain itu, penelitian ini mencoba untuk mengupas topik utama opini dari warganet terhadap kebijakan tersebut. Data diambil dari komentar warganet yang berasal dari tiga kanal berita di instagram yakni detik.com, tempo.co, dan liputan6. Data yang sudah diambil akan diolah dengan bantuan aplikasi Rapidminer. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa warganet memiliki sentimen negatif yang tinggi yakni sebesar 16.171 komentar (85%) dibandingkan dengan sentimen positif yakni sebanyak 2.945 komentar (15%). Banyak topik-topik yang dibicarakan oleh warganet yang menunjukan ketidakpercayaan pemerintah terutama dalam hal pengelolaan keuangan Tapera seperti terindikasi korupsi dan penyelewengan yang lainnya. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat disampaikan rekomendasi kebijakan kepada pemerintah untuk lebih responsif dalam menangkap sentimen, pendapat maupun masukan dari masyarakat terhadap kebijakan. Pemerintah juga perlu untuk memberikan sosialisasi yang lebih masih agar kebijakan dapat disampaikan dengan lebih jelas sehingga tujuan kebijakan akan semakin mudah tercapai.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BPS. Indikator Perumahan dan Kesehatan Lingkungan 2023. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2023.

World Bank. Strategic Framework for Mainstreaming Citizen Engagement. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2014.

World Bank. World Development Report 2016: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2017.

Cooper, Terry L., Thomas A. Bryer, and Jack W. Meek. 2006. Citizen Centered Collaborative Public Management. Public Administration Review 66(1): 76–88.

Eom, S. J., Hwang, H., & Kim, J. H. 2018. Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul, Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.002

Gaventa, John, and Gregory Barrett. 2012. Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. World Development 40(12): 2399–2410.

Göçoğlu, V., & Karkin, N. 2023. Citizen-centered public policy making in Turkey. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Kim, Soonhee. 2010. Public Trust in Government in Japan and South Korea: Does the Rise of Critical Citizens Matter? Public Administration Review 70(5): 801–810.

Kim, S., & Lee, J. 2017. Citizen participation, process, and transparency in local government: An exploratory study. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 1026–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12236

Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. 2012. An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-Based Public Engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001

Lev-On, A., & Steinfeld, N. 2015. Local Engagement Online: Municipal Facebook Pages as Hubs of Interaction. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.007

Linders, D. 2011. We-Government: An anatomy of citizen coproduction in the information age. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, 167–176.

Linke, A., & Zerfass, A. 2013. Social Media Governance: Regulatory Frameworks for Successful Online Communications. Journal of Communication Management, 17(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-09-2011-0050

Maxwell, S. P., & Carboni, J. L. 2016. Social Media Management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21232

Medaglia, R. 2012. eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29, 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010

Mergel, I. 2013. A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015

Mohammadi, S. H., Norazizan, S., & Nikkhah, H. A. 2017. Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1761–1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0565-9

Oliveira, G. H., & Welch, E. W. 2013. Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019

Panagiotopoulos, P., Bigdeli, A. Z., & Sams, S. 2014. Citizen–government collaboration on social media: The case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.014

Philpott, T. G., & Swettenham, J. 2012. The Complexities of Governing in a Social Media World. Healthcare Management Forum, 25(2), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcmf.2012.03.004

Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. 2012. Understanding Risks, Benefits, and Strategic Alternatives of Social Media Applications in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002

Picazo-Vela, S., Fernandez-Haddad, M., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. 2016. Opening the Black Box: Developing Strategies to Use Social Media in Government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.004

Reddick, Christopher G. 2011. Citizen Interaction and E-government: Evidence for the Managerial, Consultative, and Participatory Models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 5(2): 167–184.

Simonofski, A., Asensio, E. S., De Smedt, J., & Snoeck, M. 2017. Citizen participation in Smart Cities: Evaluation Framework proposal. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2017.21

Valentini, C. 2015. Is using social media good for the public relations profession? A critical reflection. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.009

Yoo, S., Song, J., & Jeong, O. 2018. Social media contents based sentiment analysis and prediction system. Expert Systems with Applications, 105, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.055

Published

2024-12-07

How to Cite

ANALISIS SENTIMEN WARGANET INDONESIA TERHADAP PERUBAHAN KEBIJAKAN TABUNGAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT. (2024). Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 8(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.37145/qy0p6p49